EMISSÃO DE GASES DO EFEITO ESTUFA COM BASE NA GERAÇÃO DE RESÍDUOS SÓLIDOS DOMÉSTICOS E CONSUMO DE ENERGIA ELÉTRICA NA ESCOLA DE ENGENHARIA DE LORENA

Authors

  • Maria Eduarda da Silva Ferreira Escola de Engenharia de Lorena, Universidade de São Paulo
  • Geovana Mantovani Rodrigues Escola de Engenharia de Lorena, Universidade de São Paulo
  • Herlandí de Souza Andrade Escola de Engenharia de Lorena, Universidade de São Paulo
  • Érica Leonor Romão Escola de Engenharia de Lorena, Universidade de São Paulo
  • Mariana Consiglio Kasemodel Escola de Engenharia de Lorena, Universidade de São Paulo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59550/engurbdebate.v3i1/2.76

Keywords:

Gases do efeito estufa, Instituições de ensino superior, pegada de carbono, SIN, IPCC

Abstract

The increase in demands related to various sectors of society, mainly with the use of land and energy, intensified the generation and disposal of solid waste and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. As a result, measures aimed at controlling and minimizing GHG emissions had to become a reality and one of these measures was the creation of an indicator called the carbon footprint or CF indicator, which counts carbon emissions from various activities or across the life cicle stages of a product. One of the main sources of GHG generation is the generation of urban solid waste, which involves the collection, transport and final disposal in a sanitary landfill, with all stages capable of generating GHG; and the consumption of electricity. Therefore, the objective of this study was the quantification of GHG from the electric energy consumption and the generation of urban solid waste at the School of Engineering of Lorena. For this, the methodology described in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Volume 5 on Waste and the average monthly emission factor of the Brazilian Interconnected System (SIN) for the base years 2021 and 2022 were used. As a result, it was obtained that the potential that the total emission from electricity consumption during the years 2021 and 2022 was 1,194.0 and 347.3 tons of carbon dioxide (tCO2), respectively. The potential for generating methane (CH4) from the generation of waste at the School of Engineering of Lorena was 2,11 tCH4. These values are below the GHG generation of other universities consulted, however, it is worth mentioning that the period analyzed in this study comprises the period of suspension of academic classroom activities. It is recommended that these analyzes be carried out semi-annually to assess the impact of the return of face-to-face activities on campus.

Author Biographies

Maria Eduarda da Silva Ferreira, Escola de Engenharia de Lorena, Universidade de São Paulo

Aluna do curso de Engenharia Ambiental da Escola de Engenharia de Lorena (EEL) da Universidade de São Paulo (USP)

Geovana Mantovani Rodrigues, Escola de Engenharia de Lorena, Universidade de São Paulo

Aluna do curso de Engenharia Ambiental da Escola de Engenharia de Lorena (EEL) da Universidade de São Paulo (USP)

Herlandí de Souza Andrade, Escola de Engenharia de Lorena, Universidade de São Paulo

Doutor em Engenharia Aeronáutica e Mecânica - Área de Produção. Professor Doutor a Escola de Engenharia de Lorena (EEL) da Universidade de São Paulo (USP) 

Érica Leonor Romão, Escola de Engenharia de Lorena, Universidade de São Paulo

Doutora em Engenharia dos Materiais. Professora Doutora na Escola de Engenharia de Lorena (EEL) da Universidade de São Paulo (USP)

Mariana Consiglio Kasemodel, Escola de Engenharia de Lorena, Universidade de São Paulo

Doutora em Geotecnia Ambiental. Professora Doutora na Escola de Engenharia de Lorena (EEL) da Universidade de São Paulo (USP)

References

BRASIL (sem data). Ministério de Ciência e Tecnologia. Fator médio – Inventários corporativos. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/mcti/pt-br/acompanhe-o-mcti/sirene/dados-e-ferramentas/fatores-de-emissao. Acesso em 22 de março de 2022.

CLABEAUX, R. CARBAJALES-DALE, M.; LADNER, D.; WALKER, T. Assessing the carbon footprint of a university campus using a life cycle assessment approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 273, 122600, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122600

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY – EPA. EPA Center for Corporate Climate Leadership. s/d. Disponível em <https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership> Acesso em 10 mar 2021.

ESOURCE. Friendly Power. Colleges and Universities. Disponível em: https://esource.bizenergyadvisor.com/article/colleges-and-universities. Acesso em 22 de março de 2022.

GARCÍA-ALAMINOS, Á.; GILLES, E.; MONSALVE, F.; ZAFRILLA, J. Measuring a university's environmental performance: A standardized proposal for carbon footprint assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 357, 131783, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131783.

IPCC - INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (2006). Inventários Nacionais de Gases do Efeito Estufa Volume 5 sobre Resíduos. Disponível em: https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/vol5.html. Acesso em 21 de março de 2022.

FILIMONAU, V.; ARCHER, D.; BELLAMY, L.; SMITH, N.; WINTRIP, R. The carbon footprint of a UK University during the COVID-19 lockdown. Science of The Total Environment, 756, 143964, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143964

KLEIN-BANAI, C.; THEIS, T. L.; BRECHEISEN, T. A.; BANAI, A. A greenhouse gas inventory as a measure of sustainability for an Urban public research university. Environmental Practice, 12(1), 35-47, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466046609990524

LEAL FILHO, W.; VARGAS, V. R.; SALVIA, A. L.; BRANDLI, L. L.; PALLANT, E.; KLAVINS, M.; RAY, S.; MOGGI, S.; MARUNA, M.; CONTICELLI, E.; AYANORE, M. A.; RADOVIC, V.; GUPTA, B.; SEN, S.; PAÇO, A.; MICHALOPOULOU, E.; SAIKIM, F. H.; KOH, H. L.; FRANKENBERGER, F.; KANCHANAMUKDA, W.; CUNHA, D. A.; AKIB, N. A. M.; CLARKE, A.; WALL, T.; VACCARI, M. The role of higher education institutions in sustainability initiatives at the local level. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233,1004-1015, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.059.

OZAWA-MEIDA, L.; BROCKWAY, P.; LETTEN, K.; DAVIES, J.; FLEMING, P. Measuring carbon performance in a UK University through a consumption-based carbon footprint: De Montfort University case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 185-198, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.09.028

RIDHOSARI, B.; RAHMAN, A. Carbon footprint assessment at Universitas Pertamina from the scope of electricity, transportation, and waste generation: Toward a green campus and promotion of environmental sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 246, 119172, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119172.

ROBINSON, O.J.; TEWKESBURY, A.; KEMP, S.; WILLIAMS, I. D. Towards a universal carbon footprint standard: a case study of carbon management at universities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4435-4455, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.147.

ROMÃO, E. L.; YAMAMOTO, A. Z.; KASEMODEL, M. C.; ANDRADE, H. S. A coleta seletiva frente as mudanças climáticas: ações em uma instituição de ensino superior. 5º Congresso Sul-americano de Resíduos Sólidos e Sustentabilidade, 2022. Anais... Gramado: Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos Ambientais, v. 5, [s. n], 2022. Disponível em: < https://www.ibeas.org.br/conresol/conresol2022/XV-015.pdf>. Acesso em 28 out. 2022.

SHI, S.; YIN, J. Global research on carbon footprint: A scientometric review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 89, 106571, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106571

USP. UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO. USP Imagens. Fotos e imagens da Universidade de São Paulo. Disponível em: <https://imagens.usp.br/escolas-faculdades-e-institutos-categorias/escola-de-engenharia-de-lorena-institutos-faculdades-e-escolas/usp-lorena-eel/> Acesso em 28 out. 2022.

VARÓN-HOYOS, M., OSORIO-TEJADA, J.; MORALES-PINZÓN, T. Carbon footprint of a university campus from Colombia. Carbon Management, 12(1), 93-107, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2021.1876531.

WIEDMANN, T.; MINX, J. A definition of ‘carbon footprint’. In: Pertsova, C.C (Ed.), Ecological Economics Research Trends. Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge NY, USA (2008), 1-11.

WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE – WRI; CONSELHO WORLD BUSINESS COUNCIL FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT – WBCSD. Greenhouse Protocol. A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard, 2015. Disponível em < https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/standards/ghg-protocol-revised.pdf> Acesso em 10 mar 2021.

YAÑEZ, P.; SINHA, A.; VÁSQUEZ, M. Carbon Footprint Estimation in a University Campus: Evaluation and Insights. Sustainability, 12, 181, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010181

Published

2023-02-20 — Updated on 2023-06-22

Versions

How to Cite

da Silva Ferreira, M. E., Mantovani Rodrigues, G., de Souza Andrade, . H. ., Leonor Romão, Érica ., & Consiglio Kasemodel, M. (2023). EMISSÃO DE GASES DO EFEITO ESTUFA COM BASE NA GERAÇÃO DE RESÍDUOS SÓLIDOS DOMÉSTICOS E CONSUMO DE ENERGIA ELÉTRICA NA ESCOLA DE ENGENHARIA DE LORENA. Urban Engineering in Debate, 3(1/2), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.59550/engurbdebate.v3i1/2.76 (Original work published February 20, 2023)

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.